Presentation 2 : Ken burns effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Burns_effect


I. Please watch Cheryl Ho’s video (a previous year student’s work):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cULOFcZ93Ug

 Point out the part(s) that applies Ken Burns Effect.

0:12 to 0:13 panning of NUS Campus map

0:14 to 0:19 panning of still images holding different sign

0:19 to 0:21 panning of ADM steps

0:21 to 0:24 panning up of LT15 steps

0:24 to 0:26 panning park steps

0:26 to 0:30 panning up of LT15 steps

0:30 to 0:35 zooming out on self

0:43 to 0:44 zooming in on subway

0:44 to 0:47 zooming out on munchies monkey

0:47 to  0:51 panning right on stress

0:57 to 1:00 panning down revealing books

1:00 to 1:05 panning view of library

1:05 to 1:07 panning out on person

1:15 to 1:20 panning across series of still shots

1:20 to 1:23 panning of image

1:24 to 1:26 panning of image

1:27 to 1:29 panning of image

1:29 to 1:32 panning left a series of images

1:33 to 1:35 zooming out on self image

1:35 to 1:38 panning of image

1:38 to 1:41 zooming out on mrt sign

 Which part(s) of using Ken Burn Effect you think are (is) good?

The ominous panning up on the LT15 with her looking up and the panning down to reveal number of books she has to cover.

 Evaluate this video from other aspects (sound, photo, script,
transition and so on). Which are (is) good and which can to be
improved?

The music is pleasant and doesn't affect the speakers voice which is clear, the pace is smooth. Transitions barely noticeable as you watch normally, which is good i think. certain parts were a little too fast like those that have series of images, people cannot see in time.